If I am not erroneous aren’t the laws
identic for everyone?
In an
abstract democratic system every citizen has been given some civic rights, be
it the Right to vote, Right to
propagation & practice of religion, Right to expression of thoughts, Right
to speech and many other basic rights. Every democratic country in this world
is bound to dispense these foundational rights to the citizens of their
countries; moreover a citizen has a indubitable right to tug for acquiring
these basic rights and that will be a justified fight and no one can traverse
or annihilate this fight. These basic rights we can say are the preeminent
building blocks of any democratic state and the society/state lacking them is
not worth to be called as democratic society/state at all.
In
the present times if we analyze that currently only those societies of the
world are robust on ground that are in forefront in providing these basic
rights to their citizens and those who are indisposed in this sphere and are
depriving their citizens of these rights surely face the brute civil rebellion
in most of the cases during the passage of time, the recent Arab spring is a
good paradigm in front of us in which people came out on streets demanding
their basal rights which were forcibly snapped from them by the rulers (dictators)
of the times. The blazes of this rebellion still continues in the some
countries in the Middle East and perhaps it will continue till the justice is
dispensed to them and the dictators are thrown out.
Back
home taking the example of J&K state here we are also
enjoying the basic rights but only some conditions apply while you want to demand your right, if I am not wrong…! Just taking the example of media working in Kashmir, at the most of the times we see
the journalists while covering any sort of protests (political or apolitical) especially in the valley face the
thwart of state forces and hence put a big question mark on the independence of
media as procreated by the state. As in any democratic state the independence
of media (Azaadi-e-Sahafat) is the main building block for its existence
and here in Kashmir its existence is thus in peril. Irony is that we oft came
to know that the security personals have barred the journalists from performing
their professional duties and most of the times lambaste them harshly. And unfortunately
face no action from the concerned authorities. This is the situation only in
the valley; does rest of the states of India affront this? No. why only we? Why
these dual standards? Recently on Friday 17-08-2012 in Jaipur a police personal was
suspended by the authorities (News item carried in “Times of India”
Saturday 18-08-2012) and do you know the antecedent? The reason was
that the cop has beaten a journo while he was covering a protest rally of the
university students. Ok fine this is what a democratic system demands from you,
proper action and timely justice. What this cop has done was totally
undemocratic and unethical where the proper action against the cop was
necessary, but what happens to this democratic system when it comes to dispense
justice and act timely here in Kashmir? Why it dwindle to dispense the
justice? As I already said that these
foundational rights are the building blocks for the existence of any democratic
state and the dearth of anyone among these can make this building of democracy
to crumple anytime. That fold up can be in the form of rebellion against the
rulers.
Many
such cases are there in which guilty has not been chastised and thus the
justice was not delivered. We heed exceptionally about the enquiries but on
ground these enquiries bear no fruits and thus delaying the justice and it has
been decorously said that “Justice delayed is Justice denied”. This saying only suits for Kashmir as
in the rest of India a desirable action was being taken against the guilty and
the justice was being dispensed to some extend but why not in Kashmir? Why are we being victimized? Why these dual
standards?
Due
to all this, there happens to have amplify a sensibility of trust defalcation
in hearts and the minds of common Kashmir masses. People are averse when it
comes to develop a contingence with the functioning of democratic system &
that’s the natural reaction. As said “to every action there is an equal and
opposite reaction”, same is the situation rampant in the valley. In
action the democratic system has failed to deliver and in the reaction people
have fed up and perhaps have no farther expectations from the system. This reaction
can also opt for a radical reaction as that of the Middle East, where people extirpated
the system which failed to deliver amply.
So
to prevent this building of democratic system from getting collapse there is a
clamant need to dispense the apt justice from every front of the state
machinery to people living in the system and let the people of the system
exercise their basic fundamental rights. No one (any element of the system) should be allowed to prevent the
citizens from demanding their basic rights and nobody should be permitted to
quench the voices in any form which demand their rights in a proper civilized
way.
These
points which I have insinuated are veritably momentous for an ideal democratic
system and if the system has to thrive it has to act upon these points made
above and most significant thing is that there should be nothing like “Double
Standards” in any democratic system as its mien make this system
delicate and obnoxious to rebellions, so this menace has to end if there is any
value for the democratic system in India or elsewhere in the world, because in
my opinion this menace of “Double
Standards” make a flourished system feeble and in longer time it
transmogrify that effectual delivering system into an ineffectual one and hence
the environment turns to be ‘hostilo’ & susceptible to ‘rebellion’
and thus the real meaning of the democratic system is lost in the air…..
No comments:
Post a Comment